Britney Spears’ Sexy Rolling Stone Cover


Written on November 24, 2008 – 7:51 pm | by taylor blue
Visited 12026 times, 84 so far today

Here is the first look at Britney Spears‘ cover for the December 11, 2008 issue of Rolling Stone. I have to say I’m a little bit disappointed. I wanted it to be really amazing.

Rolling Stone said interviewing Britney was a little hard because of Jamie Spears, her dad, controlling everything.

“We were never left alone together, and my questions had to be submitted ahead of time for approval,” reporter Jenny Eliscu writes.

And even dates are supervised too..

Larry Rudolph says, “Her job is to be Britney Spears, and unfortunately, that job bleeds into her personal life and creates this odd situation where she needs to have security people around her all the time.”

Recently, Spears was accompanied by her assistant, Brett, and Rudolph’s colleague, Adam Leber. “Right when we got there, we just knew it was just bad,” Spears says. “He looked like an older version of Harry Potter, but skinnier. … So I had to get dessert first. And the other date I had, the guy was really, really tall and a lot older. … We’re trying to ask him questions, like, ‘OK, you’re into martial arts, so what kind of martial arts are you into?’ And he was like, ‘Oh, all kinds.’ … But you know how silly we are, so we were just cracking up.”

I’m glad she is on the right path. We are all rooting for her.

photo and source

Related Articles:

Tags: , , , , , , , ,






  1. 8 Responses to “Britney Spears’ Sexy Rolling Stone Cover”

  2. By Corrine on Nov 24, 2008 | Reply

    Britney is back…she looks good….sounds good…she’s my dirty rock girl…

    [Reply]

  3. By Jessica Rae on Nov 25, 2008 | Reply

    I’m more interested in the ‘Gossip Girls Mean Girl’ who are they talking about, do you know? They’ve lured me in, they’re probably just talking about one of the chars who is mean (Blair). Psh!

    [Reply]

  4. By tay on Nov 25, 2008 | Reply

    I know..I was looking at that too..Now I’m gonna have to buy it!

    [Reply]

  5. By Jessica Rae on Nov 25, 2008 | Reply

    I bet someone online has blogged about it, or will soon!

    [Reply]

  6. By tay on Nov 25, 2008 | Reply

    I’m getting right on that.. :)

    [Reply]

  7. By Jessica Rae on Nov 25, 2008 | Reply

    You know what - it’s so dumb because obviously Britney’s stomach has been majorly photoshopped…she had TWO KIDS!!! So either that, she didn’t actually give birth to kids, or massive plastic surgery.

    [Reply]

  8. By tay on Nov 25, 2008 | Reply

    She did have csections I have seen the scars. But of course they photoshopped her. I would like to see a cover that hasn’t lately. It’s setting such an unrealistic view . :(

    [Reply]

  9. By Jessica Rae on Nov 25, 2008 | Reply

    Totally. Oh well.

    [Reply]

Post a Comment