Britney Spears Candie’s Ads: Untouched vs Photoshopped Photos
Posted by taylor blue on July 8, 2009
Visited 2703 times, 5 so far today | 6 Comments
Yesterday, the pictures of Britney Spears‘ new Candie’s ads debuted. I thought they looked great. It was met with criticism as people were saying that the polished pictures give girls an unrealistic goal to aspire to. So, to try and calm everyone’s nerves Candie’s released a pre-photoshopped picture of Britney (on the top) so everyone could see how much they didn’t really change the picture at all.
What changes do you see? I see her roots have been fixed up, she’s a bit more tanned, and the color is more vibrant. They didn’t have to do much work on her at all.
Tags: Ads, Britney Spears, Candies, Comparison, Photoshopped, Unrealistic, Untouched
Filed Under: Britney Spears
Comments (6)
Check her ass and stomach!!! Amazing. Download both photo and superpose them… you’ll see more than her roots and her tan…!!
She lost at least 20 pounds on hte retouched photo!
shit, she still pretty in both…
They did a glamour glow to the skin, which is normal. They really jacked up her hip and upper thigh line. They really shrunk those to make her ass smaller! They covered the stomach, b/c they had to, when they changed the proportion of her hip line. I was surprised they messed with the hair so much, that means a bad crew of photographer and prep team [probably not their fault], not planning the shot right first. They were probably rushed by her busy schedule. My feedback as a photographer
Thanks Drew
I didn’t notice that hip thing but they did really mess with that and the hair is really extreme. (I like your pictures by the way.)
Thx, keeping plugging away on your website, you’re doing great too.
I’m spending more time on it now.
It’s become my full-time job now.